This work was
actually done as a part of academic requirement in my MBA program. This was a
group project and I would like to acknowledge and thank my group members, Urmi
Das, Nadisha Ahmed, and Jafrin Siddique for their valuable support in doing
this work. We tried our best to produce a work of value and I think it will be
helpful for others wanting to know about or work on bank financial management.
Full work will be
published in 6 blog posts and the financial management areas of Prime Bank
Limited (PBL) those will be covered include analysis of operating performance
and credit-deposit mix, assessment of asset quality, provisioning practices, and
capital adequacy, evaluation of treasury performance and liquidity management
and analysis of risk management practices.
The very purpose of
these articles is to apply the theoretical understanding and evaluate the
practices of financial management in terms of Prime Bank Limited (PBL). For the
relevant data, the annual reports of the bank for 5 years (2010-14) are
collected and the stand alone financial statements are used instead of
consolidated one. To mention, the methods
used and results found here are not free from error, therefore, any conclusive decision
by the reader is not encouraged based on these.
This Part 01 is on
operating performance analysis where we will see the operating revenue
composition, primary drivers of operating revenue and operating
performance ratios of PBL.
Composition of Operating Revenue
The sources of operating revenue of
PBL include funded and non-funded income where funded income is generated from
the net interest income (NII) and investment income and non-funded income comes
from the commission, exchange and brokerage (CEB) and other operating sources.
Table 01 shows the operating revenue of PBL and the contribution of different
sources for 2010-14.
It can be observed that PBL earned
highest operating income of Tk. 13,472 million in 2012 which was backed by
maximum funded income of Tk. 10,045 million (74.56%) in that year. And, lowest operating income of Tk. 10,793
million is seen in 2010 with lowest funded income of Tk. 7,366 million
(68.25%). Highest non-funded income is found in 2011 of Tk. 3,716 million and
lowest Tk. 2,968 million in 2013. In
case of percentage distribution, NII is showing decreasing trend after 2012 where
the investment income is increasing from 2011. For nun-funded, CEB is showing
decreased contribution from 2010 except 2014 while others income have mixed
trend.
Table 01: Composition of Operating Revenue (in million
Tk)
|
||||||||||
Component
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
2014
|
|||||
Amount
|
%
|
Amount
|
%
|
Amount
|
%
|
Amount
|
%
|
Amount
|
%
|
|
Funded Income
|
||||||||||
NII
|
4,648
|
43.07
|
4531
|
36.16
|
5,411
|
40.17
|
4,332
|
33.63
|
2,872
|
24.12
|
Investment Income
|
2,718
|
25.18
|
4,282
|
34.18
|
4,633
|
34.39
|
5,583
|
43.33
|
6,194
|
52.03
|
Total Funded Income
|
7,366
|
68.25
|
8,814
|
70.34
|
10,045
|
74.56
|
9,915
|
76.96
|
9,067
|
76.15
|
Non Funded Income
|
||||||||||
CEB
|
2,718
|
25.19
|
2,916
|
23.27
|
2,628
|
19.51
|
2,155
|
16.73
|
2,033
|
17.08
|
Others
|
708
|
6.56
|
800
|
6.39
|
799
|
5.93
|
813
|
6.31
|
806
|
6.77
|
Total Non-Funded Income
|
3,427
|
31.75
|
3,716
|
29.66
|
3,427
|
25.44
|
2,968
|
23.04
|
2,840
|
23.85
|
Total Operating Income
|
10,793
|
100
|
12,530
|
100
|
13,472
|
100
|
12,883
|
100
|
11,906
|
100
|
Analysis of
Primary Drivers of Operating Revenue
The major source of operating revenue
of PBL is the funded income as table 01 shows, for 2010-14, about 68-76% of the
total operating income of PBL came from the funded income and this income
consists of the net interest income and investment income. A detailed
discussion on these primary drivers of operating income i.e. net interest
income (NII) and investment income is made here.
q
Net
Interest Income (NII): The net interest income is the
difference between the interest income and expense. From 2010 to 2013, both the
interest income and interest expense have an increasing trend but reduced in
2014 creating the lowest net interest income. On 2014, the NII was the lowest
as loans against trust receipts, lease finance, secured overdraft was condensed
by a significant amount and a higher amount of interest have to be paid on
saving bank deposits.
The areas of interest income of PBL are
shown in table 02 with their relative contribution in total interest income. The
major areas of interest income are Loans (General) / Musharaka, Loans against
trust receipts, Cash credit / Bai-Muajjal, and Secured overdraft. The maximum,
about 19%-22%, of the interest income is earned from secured overdraft and on
average minimum from credit card. Over the years, loans (general)/musharaka,
consumer credit scheme, and others income are showing increasing trend where
loans against trust receipt, lease fiancé/ijara, secured overdraft, and
documentary bills purchased are showing decreasing trend.
Table 02: Composition of Interest
Income of PBL (in percentage)
|
||||||
Particulars
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
2014
|
Average
|
Loans (General) /
Musharaka
|
15.88%
|
15.27%
|
17.02%
|
19.10%
|
19.20%
|
17.30%
|
Loans against trust
receipts
|
15.55%
|
16.14%
|
14.43%
|
8.74%
|
6.29%
|
12.23%
|
Lease finance /
Izara
|
5.77%
|
5.68%
|
5.69%
|
4.70%
|
3.90%
|
5.15%
|
Hire purchase
|
4.72%
|
4.59%
|
4.74%
|
5.17%
|
4.89%
|
4.82%
|
Cash credit /
Bai-Muajjal
|
13.77%
|
14.13%
|
12.30%
|
13.31%
|
13.61%
|
13.42%
|
Secured overdraft
|
20.41%
|
20.82%
|
22.75%
|
21.71%
|
19.72%
|
21.08%
|
Consumer credit
scheme
|
9.69%
|
9.12%
|
7.92%
|
8.70%
|
10.98%
|
9.28%
|
Small and Medium
Enterprise (SME)
|
0.97%
|
2.13%
|
3.07%
|
3.34%
|
2.51%
|
2.40%
|
Documentary bills
purchased
|
5.73%
|
5.39%
|
4.06%
|
3.52%
|
1.14%
|
3.97%
|
Interest income
from credit card
|
0.99%
|
0.88%
|
0.84%
|
3.41%
|
1.29%
|
1.48%
|
Others
|
6.51%
|
5.84%
|
7.17%
|
8.29%
|
16.47%
|
8.86%
|
Total Interest
Income
|
100.00%
|
100.00%
|
100.00%
|
100.00%
|
100.00%
|
100.00%
|
In interest expense, as shown in
table 03 the major areas of expense are Term deposits / Mudaraba term deposits
(50%-58%) and Deposits under scheme (22%-34%). The lowest interest expense is
seen for call deposit followed by others interest expense.
Table 03: Composition of Interest
Expense of PBL (in percentage)
|
||||||
Particulars
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
2014
|
Average
|
Savings bank /
Mudaraba savings deposits
|
6.38%
|
5.01%
|
4.32%
|
4.70%
|
5.91%
|
5.27%
|
Special notice
deposits
|
3.11%
|
2.56%
|
3.03%
|
5.35%
|
4.94%
|
3.80%
|
Term deposits /
Mudaraba term deposits
|
50.34%
|
58.74%
|
56.02%
|
58.00%
|
52.89%
|
55.20%
|
Deposits under
scheme
|
34.61%
|
25.24%
|
22.43%
|
27.29%
|
32.06%
|
28.33%
|
Call deposits
|
0.52%
|
1.42%
|
5.84%
|
1.36%
|
0.24%
|
1.88%
|
Repurchase
agreement (repo)
|
1.13%
|
4.18%
|
5.96%
|
0.66%
|
0.21%
|
2.43%
|
PBL bond
|
3.30%
|
2.27%
|
1.66%
|
1.64%
|
1.85%
|
2.15%
|
Others
|
0.60%
|
0.58%
|
0.75%
|
1.00%
|
1.91%
|
0.97%
|
Total Interest
Expense
|
100.00%
|
100.00%
|
100.00%
|
100.00%
|
100.00%
|
100.00%
|
q
Investment
Income: From table 01, it can be observed that investment income
of PBL is rising over the years reaching highest Tk. 6,194 million in 2014.
From the percentage distribution of investment portfolio in table 04 it is
found that the major areas of income are Interest on treasury bills / Reverse
repo / bonds, Gain on discounted bond / bills, and Gain on Government security
trading where the maximum percentage (74%-83%) is the interest on treasury bills, reverse repo, and bonds.
Table 04: Composition of Investment
Income of PBL (in percentage)
|
||||||
Particulars
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
2014
|
Average
|
Interest on
treasury bills / Reverse repo / bonds
|
74.72%
|
63.15%
|
82.16%
|
83.31%
|
80.69%
|
76.80%
|
Interest on
debentures / bonds
|
1.21%
|
1.84%
|
2.53%
|
1.73%
|
0.92%
|
1.64%
|
Gain on discounted
bond / bills
|
4.59%
|
6.18%
|
10.74%
|
12.04%
|
16.62%
|
10.03%
|
Gain on sale of
shares
|
0.94%
|
0.02%
|
0.24%
|
0.05%
|
0.28%
|
0.31%
|
Gain on Govt.
security trading
|
18.11%
|
18.96%
|
2.00%
|
2.73%
|
4.13%
|
9.19%
|
Dividend on shares
|
0.43%
|
11.25%
|
5.49%
|
1.61%
|
1.29%
|
4.01%
|
Less: Loss on
revaluation of security trading
|
0.00%
|
1.40%
|
3.15%
|
1.46%
|
3.93%
|
1.99%
|
Total Investment
Income
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|
Operating
Performance Ratios
Operating performance ratios i.e. Net
Interest Margin (NIM), Spread, and Operational Efficiency of PBL are shown in
table 05. From the table 4.6, it can be interpreted that
§ Net Interest Margin (NIM)
of PBL is showing positive value over the years but has a decreasing trend with lowest 1.99% in 2014. The reason
can be the increased focus of the bank to investment rather loans. Therefore,
the interest income from credit is decreasing while the decrease in expense for
deposit is not proportional to that of interest income over the years.
Table 05: Operating Ratios of PBL (in percentage)
|
||||||
Ratio
|
Formula
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
2014
|
NIM
|
[(Interest Income
– Interest Expense) / Interest Earning Assets] x 100
|
4.05
|
3.69
|
2.90
|
2.92
|
1.99
|
Spread
|
[(Interest
Income/ Interest Earning Assets) – (Interest Expense/Interest Bearing
Liabilities)] x 100
|
4.03
|
2.97
|
3.10
|
4.86
|
4.23
|
Operational
Efficiency
|
Operating
Expense/Operating Income
|
36.94
|
35.75
|
36.62
|
41.98
|
48.29
|
o
Spread,
the difference between the lending and borrowing rate of PBL is showing
fluctuating trend over the years. The highest spread was found in 2013 due to
the highest interest income against lowest earning asset out of those five
years. And, the lowest spread was seen on 2011 because of higher Interest
expense to liabilities ratio than other years.
o
Operational
Efficiency of PBL is indicating an increasing trend over the years
which means that the banks operating expense is increasing more relative to the
operating income. In addition, the decreases of operating income in 2013 and
2014 have boosted the ratio more than other years which call
for the need of operational efficiency by better cost management and fund
utilization.
No comments:
Post a Comment